<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double Angels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://midwestpoet.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/double-angels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://midwestpoet.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/double-angels/</link>
	<description>Lest They be Angels in Disguise</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scot</title>
		<link>http://midwestpoet.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/double-angels/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestpoet.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Narnie
Tweaks indeed!  Thanks so much for the time spent and the words left.  I appreciate it and  will take the advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Narnie<br />
Tweaks indeed!  Thanks so much for the time spent and the words left.  I appreciate it and  will take the advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Narnie</title>
		<link>http://midwestpoet.wordpress.com/2008/02/05/double-angels/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Narnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://midwestpoet.wordpress.com/?p=68#comment-177</guid>
		<description>I read this yesterday... co-incidence, I thought, as I was about to edit a *groan* 3000 word feature on spirituality that had been written by a friend, which is going forward for publication. Your piece had made me smile and nod gently because that is what it is Scot - a gentle acceptance put into a piece that weaves in and out almost unconsciously presenting a mindflow. By comparison the feature was stark, almost aggressive and in no way poetic - both technically and in content. There are iddy biddy tweaks that you might want to make with a detailed edit but I promise you, yours is much more worthy of publication than the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this yesterday&#8230; co-incidence, I thought, as I was about to edit a *groan* 3000 word feature on spirituality that had been written by a friend, which is going forward for publication. Your piece had made me smile and nod gently because that is what it is Scot - a gentle acceptance put into a piece that weaves in and out almost unconsciously presenting a mindflow. By comparison the feature was stark, almost aggressive and in no way poetic - both technically and in content. There are iddy biddy tweaks that you might want to make with a detailed edit but I promise you, yours is much more worthy of publication than the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
